PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
30.67%
Revenue growth of 30.67% vs. zero growth in Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
37.54%
Gross profit growth of 37.54% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
106.77%
EBIT growth of 106.77% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
-3.87%
Negative operating income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
104.84%
Net income growth of 104.84% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
104.88%
EPS growth of 104.88% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
104.88%
Diluted EPS growth of 104.88% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
0.29%
Share change of 0.29% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.29%
Diluted share change of 0.29% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.80%
OCF growth of 24.80% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
22.77%
FCF growth of 22.77% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-46.01%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 39.56%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
11235.06%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 16.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
861.29%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 10.69%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
-130.40%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
40.30%
OCF/share CAGR of 40.30% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
32.39%
3Y OCF/share growth of 32.39% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
-94.86%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Consumer Cyclical median of 70.44%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
120.89%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 14.88%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
101.17%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 12.25%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.56%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 19.65%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-24.09%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 12.85%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
-100.00%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
67.60%
Inventory growth of 67.60% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-4.84%
Assets shrink while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-0.16%
Negative BV/share change while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-71.03%
Debt is shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
132.92%
SG&A growth of 132.92% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.