PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.44 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
61.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.19%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 3.41%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
0.62%
Gross profit growth of 0.62% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
-184.03%
Negative EBIT growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-269.98%
Negative operating income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-184.58%
Negative net income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-188.40%
Negative EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-188.40%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.15%
Share change of 0.15% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
-4.03%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
262.25%
OCF growth of 262.25% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
607.60%
FCF growth of 607.60% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
619104.39%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 20.71%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
1092.96%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 7.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
181.58%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 2.82%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
-38.63%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
260.50%
OCF/share CAGR of 260.50% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
283.47%
3Y OCF/share growth of 283.47% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
-358.45%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Consumer Cyclical median of 0.97%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
45.57%
Net income/share CAGR of 45.57% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
-1162.13%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 5.71%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
152.31%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 24.83% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
-8.90%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 15.81%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
7.04%
3Y equity/share CAGR 75-90% of Consumer Cyclical median. John Neff calls for overhead or margin tweaks to keep pace with peers.
-42.33%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.08%
Inventory growth of 5.08% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
5.43%
Asset growth of 5.43% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
-7.19%
Negative BV/share change while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.20%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
39.38%
Debt growth of 39.38% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
31.23%
SG&A growth far above Consumer Cyclical median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.