PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.44 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
61.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.84%
Negative revenue growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-3.95%
Negative gross profit growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-24.76%
Negative EBIT growth while Consumer Cyclical median is -1.81%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-64.68%
Negative operating income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is -0.42%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-34.02%
Negative net income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is -3.89%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-34.71%
Negative EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is -0.98%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-31.31%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is -1.63%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.27%
Share change of 0.27% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
-0.55%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
67.69%
OCF growth of 67.69% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
45912.08%
FCF growth of 45912.08% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
98192.55%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 17.90%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
489.72%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 5.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
115.01%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 6.85%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
248.29%
OCF/share CAGR of 248.29% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
342.41%
OCF/share CAGR of 342.41% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
596.77%
3Y OCF/share growth of 596.77% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
1844.27%
Net income/share CAGR of 1844.27% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
168.03%
Net income/share CAGR of 168.03% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
155.77%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 5.14%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
-4.80%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 11.41%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
3.97%
5Y equity/share CAGR 75-90% of Consumer Cyclical median. John Neff calls for higher returns or more efficient buybacks to match peers.
35.34%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 6.27%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
-94.27%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.27%
Inventory growth of 5.27% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-61.88%
Assets shrink while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-100.00%
Negative BV/share change while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
15.45%
Debt growth of 15.45% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.08%
SG&A growth far above Consumer Cyclical median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.