PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.06%
Negative revenue growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.45%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-8.23%
Negative gross profit growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.04%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-22.68%
Negative EBIT growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.22%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-72.83%
Negative operating income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 6.48%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-42.27%
Negative net income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.28%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-42.34%
Negative EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.16%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-42.22%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.08%
Share change of 0.08% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.01%
Diluted share change of 0.01% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-63.88%
Negative OCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-80.46%
Negative FCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
47013.22%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 20.60%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
313.21%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 11.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
30.64%
3Y revenue/share growth 1.25-1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 27.10%. Mohnish Pabrai would attribute it to strong near-term market positioning.
159.90%
OCF/share CAGR of 159.90% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
185.52%
OCF/share CAGR of 185.52% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-62.94%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
603.05%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 10.41% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
130.57%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 6.11%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
-57.34%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 56.81%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
0.64%
Equity/share CAGR of 0.64% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
16.51%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.60%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
7.76%
3Y equity/share CAGR near Consumer Cyclical median. Charlie Munger notes it as typical short-term equity expansion in the sector.
-100.00%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.95%
Decreasing inventory while Consumer Cyclical is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
180.97%
Asset growth of 180.97% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.30%
Debt is shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-100.00%
R&D dropping while Consumer Cyclical median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-5.33%
SG&A decline while Consumer Cyclical grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.