PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.45%
Revenue growth of 8.45% vs. zero growth in Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
12.25%
Gross profit growth of 12.25% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
-89.47%
Negative EBIT growth while Consumer Cyclical median is -0.75%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-530.70%
Negative operating income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is -1.38%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-106.93%
Negative net income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is -0.83%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-107.21%
Negative EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-107.36%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-3.79%
Share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-5.94%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
80.89%
OCF growth of 80.89% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
89.37%
FCF growth of 89.37% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
40423.24%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 18.88%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
257.50%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 10.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
32.25%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 17.02%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
228.03%
OCF/share CAGR of 228.03% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
314.45%
OCF/share CAGR of 314.45% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-18.70%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
90.46%
Net income/share CAGR of 90.46% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
-145.65%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 3.66%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-104.66%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 13.83%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
3.96%
Below 50% of Consumer Cyclical median. Jim Chanos might suspect fundamental issues limiting equity creation over a decade.
14.95%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Consumer Cyclical median. Mohnish Pabrai might see disciplined retention of earnings behind outperformance.
4.89%
Below 50% of Consumer Cyclical median. Jim Chanos worries about inadequate short-term profitability or repeated asset impairments.
-100.00%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.17%
We have slight inventory growth while Consumer Cyclical is cutting. Peter Lynch wonders if we expect bigger future sales or if peers see a looming downturn.
-4.51%
Assets shrink while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-1.49%
Negative BV/share change while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-12.81%
Debt is shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.23%
SG&A growth far above Consumer Cyclical median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.