PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.44 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
61.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.32%
Negative revenue growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.78%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-2.39%
Negative gross profit growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.07%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-399.43%
Negative EBIT growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-4.34%
Negative operating income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.71%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-714.16%
Negative net income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-713.16%
Negative EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-713.16%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.00%
Share change of 0.00% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.24%
Negative OCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
45.21%
FCF growth of 45.21% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
178562.95%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 22.20%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
178.11%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 12.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
28.80%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 15.40%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
366.34%
OCF/share CAGR of 366.34% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
321.78%
OCF/share CAGR of 321.78% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
216.09%
3Y OCF/share growth of 216.09% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
79.08%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 7.58% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
83.79%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 12.88%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
-129.55%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
-35.33%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
23.77%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 7.51%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
-0.97%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 9.88%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.18%
Decreasing inventory while Consumer Cyclical is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
0.13%
Asset growth of 0.13% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
-0.66%
Negative BV/share change while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-7.72%
Debt is shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-100.00%
R&D dropping while Consumer Cyclical median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-2.08%
SG&A decline while Consumer Cyclical grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.