Trendzon Holdings Group Limited (1865.HK)

0.250.00 (0.40%)

Trendzon Holdings Group Limited (1865.HK) stock comprehensive Fundamental Risk Analysis including financial ratios, debt levels, liquidity, and sustainability metrics. Compare against peers/competitors, industry and sector standards.

Low Bankruptcy RiskLow ProfitabilityInefficient OperationsWeak GrowthModerate QualityAdequate Dividend ProfileIndustry Rank: 55.11%Sector Rank: 60.22%

HKSE - Industrials - Engineering & Construction | Market Cap: 184.18M | Next Earnings Date: 1 Jul 2025

Day's Range

0.25 - 0.25

52-Week Range

0.19 - 0.38

Volume

1.24M / 3.54M (Avg.)

P/E Ratio | EPS

-1.39 | -0.18

Trending:

1865.HK Fundamental Risk Analysis - Compare Against 1283.HK

Comparison against 1283.HK

None 1662.HK 1283.HK 1647.HK 1637.HK 1793.HK

Gauges a company's financial stability and solvency. Value investors pay close attention to leverage and liquidity risk, ensuring the company has enough cushion to withstand downturns without impairing shareholder value.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

0.11

Decreased from previous period

Dangerously higher D/E above 1.5x 1283.HK's 0.02. Jim Chanos would check for potential debt spiral risks.

Net Debt-to-EBITDA

-2.75

Decreased from previous period

Both companies show net cash positions. Charlie Munger would investigate if industry economics justify such conservative capitalization.

Interest Coverage Ratio

373.10

Increased from previous period

Coverage of 373.10 while 1283.HK has no interest expense. Bruce Berkowitz would demand higher returns to justify our leverage.

Current Ratio

3.19

Increased from previous period

Similar current ratio to 1283.HK's 3.19. Guy Spier would investigate if industry liquidity norms make sense for both companies.

Intangibles-to-Total-Assets Ratio

0.15%

Decreased from previous period

Intangibles of 0.15% while 1283.HK has none. Bruce Berkowitz would demand evidence of superior returns on intangible investments.

Select Chart Metric:

1865.HK Fundamental Risk Analysis - Compare Against 1283.HK

Comparison against 1283.HK

None 1662.HK 1283.HK 1647.HK 1637.HK 1793.HK

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

0.11

Decreased from previous period

Dangerously higher D/E above 1.5x 1283.HK's 0.02. Jim Chanos would check for potential debt spiral risks.

Net Debt-to-EBITDA

-2.75

Decreased from previous period

Both companies show net cash positions. Charlie Munger would investigate if industry economics justify such conservative capitalization.

Interest Coverage Ratio

373.10

Increased from previous period

Coverage of 373.10 while 1283.HK has no interest expense. Bruce Berkowitz would demand higher returns to justify our leverage.

Current Ratio

3.19

Increased from previous period

Similar current ratio to 1283.HK's 3.19. Guy Spier would investigate if industry liquidity norms make sense for both companies.

Intangibles-to-Total-Assets Ratio

0.15%

Decreased from previous period

Intangibles of 0.15% while 1283.HK has none. Bruce Berkowitz would demand evidence of superior returns on intangible investments.

Select Chart Metric: