Trendzon Holdings Group Limited (1865.HK)

0.250.00 (0.40%)

Trendzon Holdings Group Limited (1865.HK) stock comprehensive Fundamental Risk Analysis including financial ratios, debt levels, liquidity, and sustainability metrics. Compare against peers/competitors, industry and sector standards.

Low Bankruptcy RiskLow ProfitabilityInefficient OperationsWeak GrowthModerate QualityAdequate Dividend ProfileIndustry Rank: 55.11%Sector Rank: 60.22%

HKSE - Industrials - Engineering & Construction | Market Cap: 184.18M | Next Earnings Date: 1 Jul 2025

Day's Range

0.25 - 0.25

52-Week Range

0.19 - 0.38

Volume

1.24M / 3.54M (Avg.)

P/E Ratio | EPS

-1.39 | -0.18

Trending:

1865.HK Fundamental Risk Analysis

Compare against a Competitor

None 1662.HK 1283.HK 1647.HK 1637.HK 1793.HK

Gauges a company's financial stability and solvency. Value investors pay close attention to leverage and liquidity risk, ensuring the company has enough cushion to withstand downturns without impairing shareholder value.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

0.04

Increased from previous period

D/E ratio less than half the Engineering & Construction median of 0.20. Benjamin Graham would praise this conservative approach, but check if excess equity dilutes returns.

Net Debt-to-EBITDA

-6.34

Increased from previous period

Net cash position versus Engineering & Construction median net debt of -0.50. Peter Lynch would praise the flexibility but check if overcapitalized versus growth opportunities.

Interest Coverage Ratio

No Data

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Current Ratio

5.28

Increased from previous period

Current ratio exceeding 1.5x Engineering & Construction median of 1.58. Joel Greenblatt would verify if this conservative approach provides competitive advantages.

Intangibles-to-Total-Assets Ratio

0.11%

Decreased from previous period

Intangibles less than half the Engineering & Construction median of 0.87%. Warren Buffett would verify if this conservative approach misses valuable brand-building opportunities.

Select Chart Metric:

1865.HK Fundamental Risk Analysis

Compare against a Competitor

None 1662.HK 1283.HK 1647.HK 1637.HK 1793.HK

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

0.04

Increased from previous period

D/E ratio less than half the Engineering & Construction median of 0.20. Benjamin Graham would praise this conservative approach, but check if excess equity dilutes returns.

Net Debt-to-EBITDA

-6.34

Increased from previous period

Net cash position versus Engineering & Construction median net debt of -0.50. Peter Lynch would praise the flexibility but check if overcapitalized versus growth opportunities.

Interest Coverage Ratio

No Data

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Current Ratio

5.28

Increased from previous period

Current ratio exceeding 1.5x Engineering & Construction median of 1.58. Joel Greenblatt would verify if this conservative approach provides competitive advantages.

Intangibles-to-Total-Assets Ratio

0.11%

Decreased from previous period

Intangibles less than half the Engineering & Construction median of 0.87%. Warren Buffett would verify if this conservative approach misses valuable brand-building opportunities.

Select Chart Metric: