Trendzon Holdings Group Limited (1865.HK)

0.250.00 (0.40%)

Trendzon Holdings Group Limited (1865.HK) stock comprehensive Fundamental Risk Analysis including financial ratios, debt levels, liquidity, and sustainability metrics. Compare against peers/competitors, industry and sector standards.

Low Bankruptcy RiskLow ProfitabilityInefficient OperationsWeak GrowthModerate QualityAdequate Dividend ProfileIndustry Rank: 55.11%Sector Rank: 60.22%

HKSE - Industrials - Engineering & Construction | Market Cap: 184.18M | Next Earnings Date: 1 Jul 2025

Day's Range

0.25 - 0.25

52-Week Range

0.19 - 0.38

Volume

1.24M / 3.54M (Avg.)

P/E Ratio | EPS

-1.39 | -0.18

Trending:

1865.HK Fundamental Risk Analysis

Compare against a Competitor

None 1662.HK 1283.HK 1647.HK 1637.HK 1793.HK

Gauges a company's financial stability and solvency. Value investors pay close attention to leverage and liquidity risk, ensuring the company has enough cushion to withstand downturns without impairing shareholder value.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

0.58

Decreased from previous period

D/E ratio 0.5-0.7 - Moderate leverage that Peter Lynch might accept. Cross-check Net Debt to EBITDA to ensure debt load is reasonable relative to cash generation.

Net Debt-to-EBITDA

3.44

Increased from previous period

Net debt 3-4x EBITDA - Concerning leverage levels. Howard Marks would demand exceptional business stability. Essential to verify Debt-to-Equity and Interest Coverage.

Interest Coverage Ratio

No Data

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Current Ratio

2.05

Decreased from previous period

Current ratio above 2.0 - Rock-solid working capital position. Benjamin Graham would approve, but check if excess current assets hurt ROE. Consider examining Cash Conversion Cycle for efficiency.

Intangibles-to-Total-Assets Ratio

0.85%

Increased from previous period

Intangibles below 10% - Classic Benjamin Graham territory. Strong tangible asset backing provides margin of safety. Consider examining Return on Tangible Assets for operational efficiency.

Select Chart Metric:

1865.HK Fundamental Risk Analysis

Compare against a Competitor

None 1662.HK 1283.HK 1647.HK 1637.HK 1793.HK

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

0.58

Decreased from previous period

D/E ratio 0.5-0.7 - Moderate leverage that Peter Lynch might accept. Cross-check Net Debt to EBITDA to ensure debt load is reasonable relative to cash generation.

Net Debt-to-EBITDA

3.44

Increased from previous period

Net debt 3-4x EBITDA - Concerning leverage levels. Howard Marks would demand exceptional business stability. Essential to verify Debt-to-Equity and Interest Coverage.

Interest Coverage Ratio

No Data

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Current Ratio

2.05

Decreased from previous period

Current ratio above 2.0 - Rock-solid working capital position. Benjamin Graham would approve, but check if excess current assets hurt ROE. Consider examining Cash Conversion Cycle for efficiency.

Intangibles-to-Total-Assets Ratio

0.85%

Increased from previous period

Intangibles below 10% - Classic Benjamin Graham territory. Strong tangible asset backing provides margin of safety. Consider examining Return on Tangible Assets for operational efficiency.

Select Chart Metric: