PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
8935.00 - 9125.00
6347.00 - 10045.00
380.0K / 335.9K (Avg.)
23.15 | 391.09
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.49%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-1.92%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-2.60%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-4.40%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-3.10%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-3.10%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-3.10%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while 2127.T stands at 479900.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-42.18%
Negative OCF growth while 2127.T is at 1067.25%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-72.49%
Negative FCF growth while 2127.T is at 2377.76%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
20.90%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
20.90%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
20.90%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
89.60%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
89.60%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
89.60%
Positive short-term CAGR while 2127.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.