PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
8935.00 - 9125.00
6347.00 - 10045.00
380.0K / 335.9K (Avg.)
23.15 | 391.09
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.42%
Positive revenue growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
8.17%
Positive gross profit growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-1.82%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
18.93%
Positive operating income growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
1.60%
Positive net income growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
1.65%
Positive EPS growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
1.65%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.00%
Share reduction while 2127.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.00%
Reduced diluted shares while 2127.T is at 0.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
99.82%
Dividend growth above 1.5x 2127.T's 0.00%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
-52.95%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-67.96%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
15.33%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
15.33%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
15.33%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
129.00%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of 2127.T's 367.91%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
129.00%
Below 50% of 2127.T's 367.91%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
129.00%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of 2127.T's 367.91%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
8.12%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
8.12%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
8.12%
Positive short-term CAGR while 2127.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.20%
Dividend/share CAGR of 53.20% while 2127.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
53.20%
Dividend/share CAGR of 53.20% while 2127.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
53.20%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 53.20% while 2127.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.73%
Inventory is declining while 2127.T stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
2.98%
Positive asset growth while 2127.T is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
4.13%
Positive BV/share change while 2127.T is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-24.33%
We’re deleveraging while 2127.T stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.