8935.00 - 9125.00
6347.00 - 10045.00
380.0K / 335.9K (Avg.)
23.15 | 391.09
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.99%
Positive revenue growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
7.85%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x 2127.T's 2.27%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
33.42%
EBIT growth 75-90% of 2127.T's 37.59%. Bill Ackman would push for cost reforms or better product mix to narrow the gap.
36.79%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 2127.T's 7.67%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
30.54%
Net income growth under 50% of 2127.T's 74.58%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
30.59%
EPS growth under 50% of 2127.T's 76.60%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
30.59%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of 2127.T's 76.60%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.00%
Share reduction while 2127.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.00%
Reduced diluted shares while 2127.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.95%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 2127.T's 12.04%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
32.95%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 2127.T's 12.04%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
32.95%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 2127.T's 12.04%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
65.73%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
65.73%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
65.73%
Positive short-term CAGR while 2127.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.30%
Inventory growth of 2.30% while 2127.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
2.44%
Positive asset growth while 2127.T is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
5.23%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 2127.T's 0.55%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-36.39%
We’re deleveraging while 2127.T stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.