PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
8935.00 - 9125.00
6347.00 - 10045.00
380.0K / 335.9K (Avg.)
23.15 | 391.09
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.02%
Positive revenue growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
7.85%
Positive gross profit growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
14.12%
Positive EBIT growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
30.87%
Positive operating income growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
8.00%
Positive net income growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
8.01%
Positive EPS growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
8.01%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.00%
Share reduction while 2127.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.00%
Reduced diluted shares while 2127.T is at 1.88%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.61%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 2127.T's 136.88%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
1.61%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 2127.T's 136.88%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-23.57%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 2127.T stands at 111.42%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-100.00%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-100.00%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.22%
Below 50% of 2127.T's 149.73%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
0.22%
Below 50% of 2127.T's 149.73%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-39.53%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 2127.T is 189.90%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.39%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 2127.T is at 87.76%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
-100.00%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-99.58%
Firm’s AR is declining while 2127.T shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-1.78%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
6.99%
Positive asset growth while 2127.T is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
4.08%
Positive BV/share change while 2127.T is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
10.80%
Debt growth of 10.80% while 2127.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
63.10%
We expand SG&A while 2127.T cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.