PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
8935.00 - 9125.00
6347.00 - 10045.00
380.0K / 335.9K (Avg.)
23.15 | 391.09
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.77%
Negative revenue growth while 2127.T stands at 8.61%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-6.75%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-31.49%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-35.54%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-32.23%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-32.22%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-32.22%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
58.88%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 2127.T's 445.40%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-14.93%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 2127.T stands at 242.04%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
36.94%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 2127.T's 131.32%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
127.10%
Below 50% of 2127.T's 695.22%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-26.01%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 2127.T is 280.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
18.92%
Below 50% of 2127.T's 136.75%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
175.31%
Equity/share CAGR of 175.31% while 2127.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
21.78%
Below 50% of 2127.T's 170.55%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
68.66%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to 2127.T's 70.53%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.50%
Below 50% of 2127.T's 308.00%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
-18.18%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 2127.T invests at 112.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
8.70%
Our AR growth while 2127.T is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
9.23%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. 2127.T's 62.97%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
1.72%
Asset growth well under 50% of 2127.T's 16.65%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
3.25%
Under 50% of 2127.T's 16.01%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-7.42%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.66%
We expand SG&A while 2127.T cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.