PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
8935.00 - 9125.00
6347.00 - 10045.00
380.0K / 335.9K (Avg.)
23.15 | 391.09
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.92%
Positive revenue growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
5.52%
Positive gross profit growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
29.29%
Positive EBIT growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
35.99%
Positive operating income growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
30.23%
Positive net income growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
30.21%
Positive EPS growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
30.21%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
57.27%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 2127.T's 863.47%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-14.00%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 2127.T stands at 201.63%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
37.58%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of 2127.T's 73.64%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
100.00%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with 2127.T's 100.00%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
204.55%
Below 50% of 2127.T's 2817.05%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
1.06%
Below 50% of 2127.T's 196.96%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
46.13%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of 2127.T's 61.29%. Bill Ackman might push for an operational plan to match or beat the competitor’s short-term growth.
174.00%
Below 50% of 2127.T's 387.00%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
20.89%
Below 50% of 2127.T's 165.32%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
67.68%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to 2127.T's 66.58%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.00%
Firm’s AR is declining while 2127.T shows 49.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
0.71%
We show growth while 2127.T is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
0.86%
Asset growth well under 50% of 2127.T's 3.79%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
3.21%
75-90% of 2127.T's 3.63%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
20.57%
Debt growth of 20.57% while 2127.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.12%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.