PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
8935.00 - 9125.00
6347.00 - 10045.00
380.0K / 335.9K (Avg.)
23.15 | 391.09
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.02%
Positive revenue growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
1.81%
Positive gross profit growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
2.13%
Positive EBIT growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
6.86%
Positive operating income growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
1.99%
Positive net income growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
2.00%
Positive EPS growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
2.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
70.95%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 2127.T's 1151.95%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
66.15%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 2127.T's 140.36%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
36.76%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 2127.T's 87.88%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
100.00%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with 2127.T's 100.00%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
212.66%
Below 50% of 2127.T's 3360.13%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
73.93%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of 2127.T's 118.84%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
37.10%
Below 50% of 2127.T's 75.42%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
219.61%
Below 50% of 2127.T's 494.05%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
131.65%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of 2127.T's 156.74%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
64.76%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to 2127.T's 61.64%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
77.71%
Our AR growth while 2127.T is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
1.23%
We show growth while 2127.T is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
2.13%
Asset growth at 50-75% of 2127.T's 3.38%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
2.84%
Similar to 2127.T's 3.13%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
57.98%
Debt growth of 57.98% while 2127.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.69%
We expand SG&A while 2127.T cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.