PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
8935.00 - 9125.00
6347.00 - 10045.00
380.0K / 335.9K (Avg.)
23.15 | 391.09
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.61%
Positive revenue growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
7.07%
Positive gross profit growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
23.00%
Positive EBIT growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
18.46%
Positive operating income growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
42.27%
Positive net income growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
42.25%
Positive EPS growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
42.25%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.00%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.00%
Reduced diluted shares while 2127.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
22.22%
Dividend growth of 22.22% while 2127.T is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
65.40%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 2127.T's 395.79%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
61.06%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of 2127.T's 93.99%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
34.47%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of 2127.T's 63.27%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
-100.00%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
155.91%
Below 50% of 2127.T's 405.91%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
137.88%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 2127.T's 31.00%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
84.91%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 2127.T's 34.58%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
215.84%
Below 50% of 2127.T's 489.72%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
132.15%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of 2127.T's 147.98%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
65.78%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to 2127.T's 61.29%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
-8.33%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
-8.33%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 2127.T stands at 140.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
57.14%
3Y dividend/share CAGR similar to 2127.T's 60.00%. Walter Schloss finds parallel short-term dividend strategies for both companies.
34.92%
Our AR growth while 2127.T is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
1.59%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. 2127.T's 67.84%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
5.03%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x 2127.T's 3.40%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
4.95%
75-90% of 2127.T's 5.61%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
-10.52%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-45.14%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.