PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
8935.00 - 9125.00
6347.00 - 10045.00
380.0K / 335.9K (Avg.)
23.15 | 391.09
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.53%
Revenue growth under 50% of 2127.T's 50.71%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
4.70%
Gross profit growth under 50% of 2127.T's 100.80%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
33.61%
EBIT growth below 50% of 2127.T's 144.99%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
19.88%
Operating income growth under 50% of 2127.T's 161.68%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
11.98%
Net income growth under 50% of 2127.T's 140.93%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
11.99%
EPS growth under 50% of 2127.T's 143.15%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
11.99%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of 2127.T's 140.49%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.00%
Share reduction while 2127.T is at 0.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.00%
Reduced diluted shares while 2127.T is at 1.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while 2127.T stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.19%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 2127.T's 875.74%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
49.64%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 2127.T's 158.33%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
23.37%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 2127.T's 89.50%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
39.11%
Below 50% of 2127.T's 1327.16%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
35.31%
Below 50% of 2127.T's 148.87%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
27.80%
Below 50% of 2127.T's 85.78%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
180.29%
Below 50% of 2127.T's 680.28%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
118.59%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of 2127.T's 164.79%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
55.15%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of 2127.T's 105.54%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.00%
Firm’s AR is declining while 2127.T shows 32.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-0.48%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
0.68%
Positive asset growth while 2127.T is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
2.68%
75-90% of 2127.T's 3.35%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
-50.19%
We’re deleveraging while 2127.T stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.98%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 2127.T's 18.38%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.