PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
8935.00 - 9125.00
6347.00 - 10045.00
380.0K / 335.9K (Avg.)
23.15 | 391.09
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.05%
Negative revenue growth while 2127.T stands at 3.51%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-4.70%
Negative gross profit growth while 2127.T is at 3.73%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-30.38%
Negative EBIT growth while 2127.T is at 3.87%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-24.93%
Negative operating income growth while 2127.T is at 1.56%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-19.88%
Negative net income growth while 2127.T stands at 4.42%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-19.88%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-19.88%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.00%
Share reduction while 2127.T is at 0.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.00%
Reduced diluted shares while 2127.T is at 0.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
39.62%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 2127.T's 538.78%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
50.86%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of 2127.T's 95.46%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
25.47%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of 2127.T's 39.03%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.16%
Below 50% of 2127.T's 570.64%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
22.93%
Below 50% of 2127.T's 67.73%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
21.41%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of 2127.T's 32.57%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
173.04%
Below 50% of 2127.T's 673.95%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
113.90%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of 2127.T's 150.00%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
53.95%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of 2127.T's 98.11%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
122.22%
10Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of 2127.T's 174.28%. Martin Whitman suspects the firm lags in returning cash to shareholders over the decade.
128.57%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while 2127.T is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
77.78%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while 2127.T cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
49.38%
AR growth well above 2127.T's 12.57%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
6.80%
We show growth while 2127.T is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
0.73%
Asset growth well under 50% of 2127.T's 10.68%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
2.86%
Under 50% of 2127.T's 9.01%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-7.13%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.19%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 2127.T's 10.62%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.