PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
8935.00 - 9125.00
6347.00 - 10045.00
380.0K / 335.9K (Avg.)
23.15 | 391.09
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.31%
Positive revenue growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
2.91%
Positive gross profit growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
7.71%
Positive EBIT growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
7.71%
Positive operating income growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
4.16%
Positive net income growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
4.15%
Positive EPS growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
4.15%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.00%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.00%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
35.83%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 2127.T's 625.56%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
51.99%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 2127.T's 117.82%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
23.42%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to 2127.T's 24.17%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.42%
Below 50% of 2127.T's 661.80%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
33.73%
Below 50% of 2127.T's 71.90%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
23.99%
Positive short-term CAGR while 2127.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
167.66%
Below 50% of 2127.T's 648.48%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
110.15%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of 2127.T's 217.59%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
52.73%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of 2127.T's 88.52%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
77.78%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 77.78% while 2127.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
14.05%
Our AR growth while 2127.T is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-0.11%
Inventory is declining while 2127.T stands at 11.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-0.78%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
2.01%
Positive BV/share change while 2127.T is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-7.70%
We’re deleveraging while 2127.T stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.88%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 2127.T's 20.50%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.