PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
8935.00 - 9125.00
6347.00 - 10045.00
380.0K / 335.9K (Avg.)
23.15 | 391.09
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.68%
Positive revenue growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
7.34%
Positive gross profit growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
14.18%
Positive EBIT growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
14.18%
Positive operating income growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
28.60%
Positive net income growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
28.61%
Positive EPS growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
28.61%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.00%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.00%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.80%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 2127.T's 267.63%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
48.70%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to 2127.T's 44.60%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
22.33%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 2127.T's 3.81%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
63.58%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of 2127.T's 105.59%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
18.88%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
12.08%
Positive short-term CAGR while 2127.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
161.83%
Below 50% of 2127.T's 608.66%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
104.73%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of 2127.T's 203.34%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
50.85%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of 2127.T's 81.68%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
81.82%
Stable or rising dividend while 2127.T is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
77.78%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while 2127.T is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
45.45%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while 2127.T cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
43.48%
Our AR growth while 2127.T is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
3.24%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. 2127.T's 35.64%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
5.71%
Asset growth above 1.5x 2127.T's 1.36%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
3.66%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 2127.T's 1.51%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
111.10%
Debt growth of 111.10% while 2127.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.01%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.