PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
8935.00 - 9125.00
6347.00 - 10045.00
380.0K / 335.9K (Avg.)
23.15 | 391.09
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.88%
Revenue growth under 50% of 2127.T's 47.97%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
5.75%
Gross profit growth under 50% of 2127.T's 141.50%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
12.67%
EBIT growth below 50% of 2127.T's 252.58%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
12.67%
Operating income growth under 50% of 2127.T's 307.20%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-3.27%
Negative net income growth while 2127.T stands at 142.82%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-3.27%
Negative EPS growth while 2127.T is at 142.76%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-3.27%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 2127.T is at 144.13%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.00%
Share reduction while 2127.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.00%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while 2127.T stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25.34%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 2127.T's 636.64%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
48.58%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 2127.T's 34.19%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
25.30%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 2127.T's 14.65%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.18%
Below 50% of 2127.T's 685.99%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
39.74%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
28.36%
Positive short-term CAGR while 2127.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
151.08%
Below 50% of 2127.T's 604.24%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
101.86%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of 2127.T's 176.16%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
50.02%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of 2127.T's 74.29%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
35.35%
AR growth well above 2127.T's 2.27%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-2.20%
Inventory is declining while 2127.T stands at 0.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
2.82%
Positive asset growth while 2127.T is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
2.57%
Positive BV/share change while 2127.T is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-57.60%
We’re deleveraging while 2127.T stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
83.47%
SG&A growth well above 2127.T's 34.21%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.