PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
8935.00 - 9125.00
6347.00 - 10045.00
380.0K / 335.9K (Avg.)
23.15 | 391.09
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.15%
Positive revenue growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
5.86%
Positive gross profit growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
12.81%
Positive EBIT growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
12.93%
Positive operating income growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-13.39%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-13.40%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-13.40%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while 2127.T stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-2.38%
Negative OCF growth while 2127.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-2.38%
Negative FCF growth while 2127.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
157.75%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of 2127.T's 295.66%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
57.39%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 2127.T's 35.34%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
27.75%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
108.53%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 2127.T's 47.47% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
33.23%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-13.11%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
353.50%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of 2127.T's 406.03%. Bill Ackman would push for either higher ROE or more earnings retention to catch the competitor.
90.72%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with 2127.T's 96.81%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
41.66%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 2127.T's 19.37%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.07%
Our AR growth while 2127.T is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
3.03%
We show growth while 2127.T is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
3.36%
Positive asset growth while 2127.T is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
2.00%
Positive BV/share change while 2127.T is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-33.66%
We’re deleveraging while 2127.T stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
83.99%
SG&A growth well above 2127.T's 23.73%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.