PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
8935.00 - 9125.00
6347.00 - 10045.00
380.0K / 335.9K (Avg.)
23.15 | 391.09
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.99%
Positive revenue growth while 3088.T is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
7.85%
Positive gross profit growth while 3088.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
33.42%
Positive EBIT growth while 3088.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
36.79%
Operating income growth under 50% of 3088.T's 75.34%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
30.54%
Positive net income growth while 3088.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
30.59%
Positive EPS growth while 3088.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
30.59%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 3088.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.00%
Share reduction while 3088.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.00%
Reduced diluted shares while 3088.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.95%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 3088.T's 9.09%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
32.95%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 3088.T's 9.09%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
32.95%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 3088.T's 9.09%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
65.73%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 3088.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
65.73%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 3088.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
65.73%
Positive short-term CAGR while 3088.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.30%
Inventory growth well above 3088.T's 0.40%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
2.44%
Positive asset growth while 3088.T is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
5.23%
Positive BV/share change while 3088.T is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-36.39%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.