PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
8935.00 - 9125.00
6347.00 - 10045.00
380.0K / 335.9K (Avg.)
23.15 | 391.09
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.77%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 3088.T's 3.01%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
11.04%
Positive gross profit growth while 3088.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
39.63%
Positive EBIT growth while 3088.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
44.97%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of 3088.T's 84.48%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
44.92%
Positive net income growth while 3088.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
44.95%
Positive EPS growth while 3088.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
44.95%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 3088.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.00%
Share change of 0.00% while 3088.T is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
59.52%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 3088.T's 14.98%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
59.52%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 3088.T's 14.98%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
59.52%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 3088.T's 14.98%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
119.21%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 3088.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
119.21%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 3088.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
119.21%
Positive short-term CAGR while 3088.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.94%
Inventory is declining while 3088.T stands at 3.69%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
2.12%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x 3088.T's 1.61%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
6.96%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 3088.T's 0.29%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-54.14%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.