PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
8935.00 - 9125.00
6347.00 - 10045.00
380.0K / 335.9K (Avg.)
23.15 | 391.09
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.23%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
4.03%
Positive gross profit growth while 3088.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
16.71%
Positive EBIT growth while 3088.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
10.30%
Positive operating income growth while 3088.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
4.09%
Positive net income growth while 3088.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
4.08%
Positive EPS growth while 3088.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
4.08%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 3088.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.00%
Share reduction while 3088.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.00%
Reduced diluted shares while 3088.T is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while 3088.T stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
59.09%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 3088.T's 26.99%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
71.44%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 3088.T's 0.22%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
36.36%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 3088.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-100.00%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
155.81%
Below 50% of 3088.T's 838.29%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
122.26%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 3088.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
61.49%
Positive short-term CAGR while 3088.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
198.97%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 3088.T's 128.88%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
124.19%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 3088.T's 43.71%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
57.00%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 3088.T's 22.75%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while 3088.T stands at 423.29%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.00%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
0.29%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. 3088.T's 3.49%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-1.54%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
4.33%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 3088.T's 0.94%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-44.81%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
89.49%
SG&A growth well above 3088.T's 19.44%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.