PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
8935.00 - 9125.00
6347.00 - 10045.00
380.0K / 335.9K (Avg.)
23.15 | 391.09
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.53%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of 3141.T's 4.02%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
4.70%
Positive gross profit growth while 3141.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
33.61%
EBIT growth 1.25-1.5x 3141.T's 24.55%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic initiatives are driving this edge.
19.88%
Positive operating income growth while 3141.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
11.98%
Positive net income growth while 3141.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
11.99%
Positive EPS growth while 3141.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
11.99%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 3141.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.00%
Share reduction while 3141.T is at 0.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.00%
Reduced diluted shares while 3141.T is at 0.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.19%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 3141.T's 155.20%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
49.64%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of 3141.T's 61.87%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
23.37%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of 3141.T's 31.03%. Bill Ackman would expect new product strategies to close the gap.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
39.11%
Below 50% of 3141.T's 115.55%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
35.31%
Below 50% of 3141.T's 89.07%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
27.80%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to 3141.T's 27.29%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
180.29%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of 3141.T's 266.90%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
118.59%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 3141.T's 72.63%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
55.15%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 3141.T's 38.37%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.00%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-0.48%
Inventory is declining while 3141.T stands at 6.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
0.68%
Positive asset growth while 3141.T is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
2.68%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 3141.T's 1.64%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-50.19%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.98%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 3141.T's 31.89%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.