PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
8935.00 - 9125.00
6347.00 - 10045.00
380.0K / 335.9K (Avg.)
23.15 | 391.09
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.69%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-7.03%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-15.27%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-30.94%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-15.78%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-15.82%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-15.82%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.00%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.00%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-50.98%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-113.96%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
34.87%
10Y CAGR of 34.87% while 3391.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
34.87%
5Y CAGR of 34.87% while 3391.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
34.87%
3Y CAGR of 34.87% while 3391.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
78.18%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 78.18% while 3391.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
78.18%
Net income/share CAGR of 78.18% while 3391.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
78.18%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 78.18% while 3391.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
46.81%
Equity/share CAGR of 46.81% while 3391.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
46.81%
Equity/share CAGR of 46.81% while 3391.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
46.81%
Equity/share CAGR of 46.81% while 3391.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.76%
We show growth while 3391.T is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
1.70%
Positive asset growth while 3391.T is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
4.85%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 3391.T's 2.83%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-12.38%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.