PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
8935.00 - 9125.00
6347.00 - 10045.00
380.0K / 335.9K (Avg.)
23.15 | 391.09
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.69%
Revenue growth under 50% of 3391.T's 15.20%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
1.43%
Gross profit growth under 50% of 3391.T's 14.63%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
10.35%
EBIT growth below 50% of 3391.T's 44.24%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
2.77%
Operating income growth under 50% of 3391.T's 60.34%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
10.77%
Net income growth under 50% of 3391.T's 39.64%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
10.76%
EPS growth under 50% of 3391.T's 39.21%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
10.76%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of 3391.T's 39.16%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.00%
Share reduction while 3391.T is at 0.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.00%
Reduced diluted shares while 3391.T is at 0.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25.00%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 3391.T's 110.98%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-4.42%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 3391.T stands at 78.93%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-31.64%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 3391.T stands at 57.33%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
100.00%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 3391.T is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
100.00%
Positive OCF/share growth while 3391.T is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
128.06%
Below 50% of 3391.T's 276.25%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
16.10%
Below 50% of 3391.T's 150.42%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-24.32%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 3391.T is 72.70%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
93.99%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of 3391.T's 118.73%. Bill Ackman would push for either higher ROE or more earnings retention to catch the competitor.
30.55%
Below 50% of 3391.T's 85.95%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
-14.41%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 3391.T is at 45.92%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.45%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-2.50%
Inventory is declining while 3391.T stands at 3.97%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-0.38%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
3.50%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 3391.T's 0.50%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-0.73%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.10%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 3391.T's 5.34%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.