8935.00 - 9125.00
6347.00 - 10045.00
380.0K / 335.9K (Avg.)
23.15 | 391.09
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.99%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 9843.T's 0.92%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
7.85%
Positive gross profit growth while 9843.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
33.42%
Positive EBIT growth while 9843.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
36.79%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 9843.T's 1.15%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
30.54%
Net income growth above 1.5x 9843.T's 2.86%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
30.59%
EPS growth above 1.5x 9843.T's 2.88%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
30.59%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x 9843.T's 2.79%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
-0.00%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.00%
Reduced diluted shares while 9843.T is at 0.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.95%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 9843.T's 15.61%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
32.95%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 9843.T's 15.61%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
32.95%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 9843.T's 15.61%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
65.73%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 9843.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
65.73%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 9843.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
65.73%
Positive short-term CAGR while 9843.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.30%
We show growth while 9843.T is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
2.44%
Asset growth at 50-75% of 9843.T's 3.29%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
5.23%
1.25-1.5x 9843.T's 4.38%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
-36.39%
We’re deleveraging while 9843.T stands at 26.34%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.