PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
8935.00 - 9125.00
6347.00 - 10045.00
380.0K / 335.9K (Avg.)
23.15 | 391.09
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.27%
Revenue growth at 75-90% of 9843.T's 10.86%. Bill Ackman would push for innovation or market expansion to catch up.
11.47%
Gross profit growth similar to 9843.T's 10.86%. Walter Schloss would assume both firms track common industry trends.
16.10%
EBIT growth above 1.5x 9843.T's 7.00%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
15.53%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 9843.T's 6.97%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
12.54%
Positive net income growth while 9843.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
12.53%
Positive EPS growth while 9843.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
12.53%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 9843.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
81.38%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 9843.T's 28.91%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
81.38%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 9843.T's 28.91%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
63.60%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 9843.T's 28.91%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
-100.00%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-100.00%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-100.00%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
95.12%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 9843.T's 75.54%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
95.12%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 9843.T's 75.54%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
58.16%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of 9843.T's 75.54%. Bill Ackman might push for an operational plan to match or beat the competitor’s short-term growth.
124.82%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 9843.T's 62.13%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
124.82%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 9843.T's 62.13%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
84.15%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 9843.T's 62.13%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
-50.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while 9843.T stands at 80.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-50.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 9843.T stands at 80.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
30.43%
Below 50% of 9843.T's 80.00%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
22462.50%
Our AR growth while 9843.T is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
4.04%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. 9843.T's 9.19%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
13.63%
Positive asset growth while 9843.T is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
5.35%
Similar to 9843.T's 5.27%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
141.03%
We have some new debt while 9843.T reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.00%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.