PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
8935.00 - 9125.00
6347.00 - 10045.00
380.0K / 335.9K (Avg.)
23.15 | 391.09
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.54%
Positive growth while 2127.T shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.64%
Similar cost growth to 2127.T's 3.25%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
2.13%
Positive growth while 2127.T shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.40%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.77%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
0.53%
Operating expenses growth while 2127.T reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.29%
Total costs growth above 1.5x 2127.T's 0.77%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-4.00%
Interest expense reduction while 2127.T shows 592.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-14.45%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
9.17%
EBITDA growth while 2127.T declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.47%
EBITDA margin growth while 2127.T declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.13%
Operating income growth while 2127.T declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.45%
Operating margin growth while 2127.T declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-46.16%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-4.06%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.43%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.79%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-4.25%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.26%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.26%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.00%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.00%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.