PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
8935.00 - 9125.00
6347.00 - 10045.00
380.0K / 335.9K (Avg.)
23.15 | 391.09
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.48%
Revenue decline while 2127.T shows 6.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-7.48%
Cost reduction while 2127.T shows 24.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-7.46%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.02%
Margin expansion while 2127.T shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.77%
Other expenses growth while 2127.T reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.60%
Operating expenses growth while 2127.T reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-6.23%
Total costs reduction while 2127.T shows 14.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
6.67%
Interest expense growth less than half of 2127.T's 105.67%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-0.99%
D&A reduction while 2127.T shows 7.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-18.56%
EBITDA decline while 2127.T shows 3.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.98%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-28.32%
Operating income decline while 2127.T shows 0.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.53%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
83.23%
Other expenses growth less than half of 2127.T's 1348.01%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-24.99%
Pre-tax income decline while 2127.T shows 3.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.93%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-23.91%
Tax expense reduction while 2127.T shows 2.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-25.47%
Net income decline while 2127.T shows 2.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-19.45%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-25.47%
EPS decline while 2127.T shows 2.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.47%
Diluted EPS decline while 2127.T shows 3.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.00%
Share count reduction while 2127.T shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.00%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.