PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
8935.00 - 9125.00
6347.00 - 10045.00
380.0K / 335.9K (Avg.)
23.15 | 391.09
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.99%
Revenue decline while 2127.T shows 21.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-4.18%
Cost reduction while 2127.T shows 27.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-3.25%
Gross profit decline while 2127.T shows 17.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.78%
Margin expansion while 2127.T shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.68%
Other expenses growth while 2127.T reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.12%
Operating expenses growth less than half of 2127.T's 11.73%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-2.95%
Total costs reduction while 2127.T shows 21.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-8.33%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
5.51%
D&A growth less than half of 2127.T's 13.41%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-15.99%
EBITDA decline while 2127.T shows 23.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.50%
EBITDA margin decline while 2127.T shows 1.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-27.13%
Operating income decline while 2127.T shows 21.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.11%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.50%
Other expenses growth less than half of 2127.T's 127.73%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-25.03%
Pre-tax income decline while 2127.T shows 22.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.91%
Pre-tax margin decline while 2127.T shows 0.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-23.65%
Tax expense reduction while 2127.T shows 21.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-25.66%
Net income decline while 2127.T shows 23.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.57%
Net margin decline while 2127.T shows 1.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.65%
EPS decline while 2127.T shows 23.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.65%
Diluted EPS decline while 2127.T shows 23.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.00%
Share count reduction while 2127.T shows 0.02% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.00%
Diluted share reduction while 2127.T shows 0.09% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.