PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
8935.00 - 9125.00
6347.00 - 10045.00
380.0K / 335.9K (Avg.)
23.15 | 391.09
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.78%
Revenue decline while 2127.T shows 43.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-7.09%
Cost reduction while 2127.T shows 18.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-5.59%
Gross profit decline while 2127.T shows 68.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.27%
Margin expansion below 50% of 2127.T's 17.74%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.55%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-5.97%
Total costs reduction while 2127.T shows 8.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while 2127.T shows 16.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.06%
D&A growth less than half of 2127.T's 152.82%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-18.12%
EBITDA decline while 2127.T shows 185.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.16%
EBITDA margin decline while 2127.T shows 99.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.32%
Operating income decline while 2127.T shows 169.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.82%
Operating margin decline while 2127.T shows 88.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
26.39%
Other expenses growth less than half of 2127.T's 311.34%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-22.29%
Pre-tax income decline while 2127.T shows 187.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.64%
Pre-tax margin decline while 2127.T shows 100.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.16%
Tax expense reduction while 2127.T shows 134.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-22.82%
Net income decline while 2127.T shows 230.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.21%
Net margin decline while 2127.T shows 130.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.81%
EPS decline while 2127.T shows 230.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.81%
Diluted EPS decline while 2127.T shows 230.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.00%
Share count reduction while 2127.T shows 0.01% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.00%
Diluted share reduction while 2127.T shows 0.01% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.