PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
8935.00 - 9125.00
6347.00 - 10045.00
380.0K / 335.9K (Avg.)
23.15 | 391.09
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.66%
Negative revenue growth while 2127.T stands at 41.07%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-4.38%
Negative gross profit growth while 2127.T is at 52.19%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-15.27%
Negative EBIT growth while 2127.T is at 68.22%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-23.77%
Negative operating income growth while 2127.T is at 69.07%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-15.66%
Negative net income growth while 2127.T stands at 46.33%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-15.66%
Negative EPS growth while 2127.T is at 46.37%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-15.66%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 2127.T is at 49.20%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
74.19%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 2127.T's 542.44%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
66.93%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 2127.T's 294.08%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
36.33%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 2127.T's 146.18%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
197.70%
Below 50% of 2127.T's 863.05%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
61.57%
Below 50% of 2127.T's 380.81%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
48.90%
Below 50% of 2127.T's 138.60%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
222.31%
Equity/share CAGR of 222.31% while 2127.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
133.90%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of 2127.T's 170.51%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
65.83%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to 2127.T's 64.30%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 2127.T stands at 340.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
50.00%
Below 50% of 2127.T's 131.58%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
147.76%
AR growth well above 2127.T's 68.23%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
8.38%
We show growth while 2127.T is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
1.02%
Asset growth well under 50% of 2127.T's 14.00%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
3.65%
Under 50% of 2127.T's 13.13%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-7.61%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.36%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 2127.T's 13.00%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.