PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
8935.00 - 9125.00
6347.00 - 10045.00
380.0K / 335.9K (Avg.)
23.15 | 391.09
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
14.27%
Positive revenue growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
9.27%
Positive gross profit growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
16.77%
Positive EBIT growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
29.33%
Positive operating income growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
31.60%
Positive net income growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
31.60%
Positive EPS growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
31.60%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
77.86%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 2127.T's 454.89%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
81.50%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to 2127.T's 88.49%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
44.91%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 2127.T's 39.98%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
-100.00%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
149.69%
Below 50% of 2127.T's 462.70%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
103.51%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 2127.T's 53.36%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
27.68%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of 2127.T's 31.04%. Bill Ackman might push for an operational plan to match or beat the competitor’s short-term growth.
198.41%
Below 50% of 2127.T's 611.36%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
123.92%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of 2127.T's 161.49%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
56.55%
Below 50% of 2127.T's 117.43%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
160.87%
Below 50% of 2127.T's 1340.01%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
84.62%
Below 50% of 2127.T's 215.79%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
33.33%
Below 50% of 2127.T's 71.43%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
-48.82%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
7.60%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. 2127.T's 73.10%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
13.64%
Asset growth above 1.5x 2127.T's 2.42%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
5.21%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 2127.T's 2.43%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
63.09%
We have some new debt while 2127.T reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.38%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.