PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
8935.00 - 9125.00
6347.00 - 10045.00
380.0K / 335.9K (Avg.)
23.15 | 391.09
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.06%
Positive revenue growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
3.06%
Positive gross profit growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-44.76%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-7.53%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-34.48%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-34.48%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-34.48%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
45.54%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 2127.T's 505.70%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
54.62%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 2127.T's 113.19%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
25.47%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 2127.T's 60.85%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
62.16%
Below 50% of 2127.T's 934.37%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
72.44%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to 2127.T's 74.32%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
-3.19%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 2127.T is 93.40%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
187.26%
Below 50% of 2127.T's 659.37%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
123.92%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of 2127.T's 161.10%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
56.65%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of 2127.T's 99.60%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-21.43%
Cut dividends over 10 years while 2127.T stands at 6139.80%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
57.14%
5Y dividend/share CAGR at 75-90% of 2127.T's 73.33%. Bill Ackman wants more robust earnings or a higher payout ratio to match the competitor.
22.22%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while 2127.T cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
16.28%
Our AR growth while 2127.T is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
8.26%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. 2127.T's 101.77%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
6.92%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x 2127.T's 5.26%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
3.38%
75-90% of 2127.T's 3.88%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
75.68%
We have some new debt while 2127.T reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.04%
We expand SG&A while 2127.T cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.