PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
8935.00 - 9125.00
6347.00 - 10045.00
380.0K / 335.9K (Avg.)
23.15 | 391.09
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.52%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of 2127.T's 8.46%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
4.09%
Positive gross profit growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-0.99%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-1.75%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
23.00%
Positive net income growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
22.99%
Positive EPS growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
22.99%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.00%
Slight or no buybacks while 2127.T is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.00%
Slight or no buyback while 2127.T is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
150.12%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 2127.T's 338.43%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
55.30%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 2127.T's 126.01%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
35.06%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 2127.T's 73.08%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
182.20%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of 2127.T's 268.62%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
18.63%
Below 50% of 2127.T's 181.39%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
27.20%
Below 50% of 2127.T's 117.24%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
325.14%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with 2127.T's 300.33%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
83.13%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 2127.T's 61.44%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
35.58%
Positive short-term equity growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
100.00%
Below 50% of 2127.T's 380.00%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
118.18%
5Y dividend/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 2127.T's 100.00%. Bruce Berkowitz verifies that high dividend hikes remain sustainable, not a sign of over-distribution.
118.18%
3Y dividend/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 2127.T's 84.62%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the company's short-term profits or payout policy justify these higher hikes.
12.35%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. 2127.T's 123.87%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
4.44%
We show growth while 2127.T is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
10.86%
Positive asset growth while 2127.T is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
3.19%
Positive BV/share change while 2127.T is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
218.26%
Debt growth of 218.26% while 2127.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.27%
We expand SG&A while 2127.T cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.