PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
8935.00 - 9125.00
6347.00 - 10045.00
380.0K / 335.9K (Avg.)
23.15 | 391.09
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.87%
Positive revenue growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
12.17%
Positive gross profit growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
54.90%
Positive EBIT growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
49.18%
Positive operating income growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
14.74%
Positive net income growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
14.74%
Positive EPS growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
14.74%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.00%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.00%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
149.77%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of 2127.T's 216.32%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
59.05%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 2127.T's 0.65%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
38.14%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
199.81%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 2127.T's 14.44% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
61.16%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 2127.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
30.34%
Positive short-term CAGR while 2127.T is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
318.66%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 2127.T's 282.29%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
81.97%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 2127.T's 49.99%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
35.33%
Positive short-term equity growth while 2127.T is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.30%
Our AR growth while 2127.T is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
0.78%
Inventory growth of 0.78% while 2127.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
1.69%
Positive asset growth while 2127.T is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
2.49%
Positive BV/share change while 2127.T is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-21.26%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.14%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 2127.T's 14.63%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.