PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
8935.00 - 9125.00
6347.00 - 10045.00
380.0K / 335.9K (Avg.)
23.15 | 391.09
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.43%
Positive revenue growth while 3141.T is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-1.29%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
1.44%
Positive EBIT growth while 3141.T is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
-18.28%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
5.98%
Positive net income growth while 3141.T is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
5.99%
Positive EPS growth while 3141.T is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
5.99%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 3141.T is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.00%
Share reduction while 3141.T is at 3.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.31%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 3141.T's 72.88%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
2.26%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 3141.T's 21.53%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-26.41%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 3141.T stands at 12.74%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
100.00%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with 3141.T's 100.00%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
100.00%
Positive OCF/share growth while 3141.T is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
108.41%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of 3141.T's 170.16%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
54.75%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to 3141.T's 52.64%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
-17.52%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 3141.T is 11.65%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
63.41%
Equity/share CAGR of 63.41% while 3141.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
33.94%
Below 50% of 3141.T's 92.23%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
-10.40%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 3141.T is at 62.68%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.52%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. 3141.T's 18.96%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
6.64%
Asset growth above 1.5x 3141.T's 1.23%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
3.81%
Positive BV/share change while 3141.T is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
66.15%
We have some new debt while 3141.T reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.57%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 3141.T's 42.93%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.