PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
8935.00 - 9125.00
6347.00 - 10045.00
380.0K / 335.9K (Avg.)
23.15 | 391.09
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.49%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-1.92%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-2.60%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-4.40%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-3.10%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-3.10%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-3.10%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-42.18%
Negative OCF growth while 9843.T is at 4.96%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-72.49%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
20.90%
10Y CAGR of 20.90% while 9843.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
20.90%
5Y CAGR of 20.90% while 9843.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
20.90%
3Y CAGR of 20.90% while 9843.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
89.60%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 89.60% while 9843.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
89.60%
Net income/share CAGR of 89.60% while 9843.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
89.60%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 89.60% while 9843.T is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.