PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
8935.00 - 9125.00
6347.00 - 10045.00
380.0K / 335.9K (Avg.)
23.15 | 391.09
Gauges a company's financial stability and solvency. Value investors pay close attention to leverage and liquidity risk, ensuring the company has enough cushion to withstand downturns without impairing shareholder value.
0.52
D/E of 0.52 while 3141.T has all-equity financing. Bruce Berkowitz would demand higher returns to justify our leverage.
0.03
Net debt 1-2x EBITDA - Reasonable leverage that Peter Lynch might accept. Cross-check Current Ratio to verify short-term liquidity remains strong.
36.47
Similar coverage to 3141.T's 35.15. Guy Spier would investigate if industry coverage norms make sense for both companies.
0.90
Current ratio of 0.90 while 3141.T has zero ratio. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if our working capital management provides advantages.
0.43%
Intangibles of 0.43% while 3141.T has none. Bruce Berkowitz would demand evidence of superior returns on intangible investments.