8935.00 - 9125.00
6347.00 - 10045.00
380.0K / 335.9K (Avg.)
23.15 | 391.09
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.05%
Revenue decline while 2127.T shows 3.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-3.89%
Cost reduction while 2127.T shows 3.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-4.70%
Gross profit decline while 2127.T shows 3.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.67%
Margin decline while 2127.T shows 0.22% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.49%
Other expenses growth less than half of 2127.T's 110.02%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
1.19%
Operating expenses growth less than half of 2127.T's 10.62%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-3.07%
Total costs reduction while 2127.T shows 5.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
7.69%
Similar interest expense growth to 2127.T's 8.07%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
5.66%
D&A growth less than half of 2127.T's 15.11%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-12.60%
EBITDA decline while 2127.T shows 3.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.90%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-24.93%
Operating income decline while 2127.T shows 1.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.76%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
52.21%
Other expenses growth less than half of 2127.T's 189.75%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-19.43%
Pre-tax income decline while 2127.T shows 3.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.02%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.46%
Tax expense reduction while 2127.T shows 2.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-19.88%
Net income decline while 2127.T shows 4.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.49%
Net margin decline while 2127.T shows 0.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-19.88%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-19.88%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.00%
Share count reduction while 2127.T shows 0.01% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.00%
Diluted share reduction while 2127.T shows 0.18% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.