PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
8935.00 - 9125.00
6347.00 - 10045.00
380.0K / 335.9K (Avg.)
23.15 | 391.09
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.49%
Revenue decline while 3141.T shows 6.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-2.63%
Cost reduction while 3141.T shows 6.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-1.92%
Gross profit decline while 3141.T shows 5.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.58%
Margin expansion while 3141.T shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.95%
Other expenses growth less than half of 3141.T's 48.31%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-1.23%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-2.40%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
6.06%
Interest expense growth while 3141.T reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.36%
D&A growth above 1.5x 3141.T's 5.83%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-0.24%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.31%
EBITDA margin growth while 3141.T declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.40%
Operating income decline while 3141.T shows 16.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.96%
Operating margin decline while 3141.T shows 10.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
17.46%
Other expenses growth while 3141.T reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-2.72%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.24%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.25%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-3.10%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.63%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.10%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.10%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.