PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
8935.00 - 9125.00
6347.00 - 10045.00
380.0K / 335.9K (Avg.)
23.15 | 391.09
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.48%
Revenue decline while 9843.T shows 8.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-7.48%
Cost reduction while 9843.T shows 6.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-7.46%
Gross profit decline while 9843.T shows 10.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.02%
Margin expansion below 50% of 9843.T's 1.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.77%
Other expenses growth less than half of 9843.T's 30.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
0.60%
Operating expenses growth less than half of 9843.T's 6.02%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-6.23%
Total costs reduction while 9843.T shows 6.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
6.67%
Interest expense growth while 9843.T reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.99%
D&A reduction while 9843.T shows 0.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-18.56%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.98%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-28.32%
Operating income decline while 9843.T shows 16.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.53%
Operating margin decline while 9843.T shows 7.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
83.23%
Other expenses growth while 9843.T reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-24.99%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.93%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-23.91%
Tax expense reduction while 9843.T shows 5.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-25.47%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-19.45%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-25.47%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-25.47%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.00%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.00%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.