PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.13%
Revenue growth under 50% of 8028.HK's 6223.60%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-32.23%
Negative gross profit growth while 8028.HK is at 1133.33%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-1.43%
Negative EBIT growth while 8028.HK is at 84.68%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
7.47%
Operating income growth under 50% of 8028.HK's 84.09%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-20.98%
Negative net income growth while 8028.HK stands at 78.76%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-21.43%
Negative EPS growth while 8028.HK is at 78.81%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-21.43%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 8028.HK is at 78.81%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.49%
Share reduction while 8028.HK is at 0.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.49%
Reduced diluted shares while 8028.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
71.58%
Positive OCF growth while 8028.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
63.41%
Positive FCF growth while 8028.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.76%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.