PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.32%
Revenue growth under 50% of 8028.HK's 95.40%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
140.37%
Gross profit growth under 50% of 8028.HK's 453.09%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
308.31%
EBIT growth 75-90% of 8028.HK's 370.99%. Bill Ackman would push for cost reforms or better product mix to narrow the gap.
320.99%
Operating income growth at 75-90% of 8028.HK's 364.63%. Bill Ackman would demand a plan to enhance operating leverage.
205.65%
Net income growth comparable to 8028.HK's 202.00%. Walter Schloss might see both following similar market or cost trajectories.
179.41%
EPS growth at 75-90% of 8028.HK's 202.00%. Bill Ackman would push for improved profitability or share repurchases to catch up.
179.41%
Diluted EPS growth at 75-90% of 8028.HK's 202.00%. Bill Ackman would expect further improvements in net income or share count reduction.
33.99%
Share count expansion well above 8028.HK's 0.38%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
33.99%
Diluted share count expanding well above 8028.HK's 0.39%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
OCF growth of 100.00% while 8028.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
100.00%
FCF growth of 100.00% while 8028.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
-17.08%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 8028.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-17.08%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 8028.HK stands at 2646.98%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-17.08%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.92%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 8028.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-14.92%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 8028.HK is 460.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-14.92%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 8028.HK is 114.62%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.67%
SG&A growth well above 8028.HK's 26.36%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.