PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
52.04%
Positive revenue growth while 8028.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
31.81%
Positive gross profit growth while 8028.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-83.21%
Negative EBIT growth while 8028.HK is at 66.82%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-70.86%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-123.88%
Negative net income growth while 8028.HK stands at 673.29%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-123.53%
Negative EPS growth while 8028.HK is at 669.57%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-123.53%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 8028.HK is at 669.57%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
149.75%
10Y CAGR of 149.75% while 8028.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
149.75%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 8028.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
149.75%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 8028.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-105.67%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 8028.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-105.67%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 8028.HK is 113.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-105.67%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 8028.HK is 114.38%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
185.23%
Equity/share CAGR of 185.23% while 8028.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
185.23%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while 8028.HK is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
185.23%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 8028.HK's 20.33%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
49.37%
SG&A growth well above 8028.HK's 45.85%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.