PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.07 - 0.07
0.04 - 0.15
840.0K / 2.59M (Avg.)
-2.33 | -0.03
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-9.83%
Negative revenue growth while 8028.HK stands at 235.58%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
126.59%
Gross profit growth under 50% of 8028.HK's 669.98%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
47.98%
EBIT growth below 50% of 8028.HK's 261.22%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
42.24%
Operating income growth under 50% of 8028.HK's 234.90%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
38.63%
Net income growth under 50% of 8028.HK's 109.19%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
38.97%
EPS growth under 50% of 8028.HK's 109.20%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
38.97%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of 8028.HK's 109.20%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.29%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 8028.HK's 6508.40%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
40.29%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 8028.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
40.29%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 8028.HK's 183.79%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
866.91%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 8028.HK's 9.96%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
866.91%
Positive OCF/share growth while 8028.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
866.91%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 866.91% while 8028.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
-22.55%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 8028.HK is at 191.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-22.55%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 8028.HK is 104.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-22.55%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 8028.HK is 115.94%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.55%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 8028.HK's 143.71%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.